Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Billy Harris vs Ben Patael Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Harris vs Patael analysis and find out who is favored!
Billy Harris vs Ben Patael Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Harris 1 - 1 Patael
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Harris has won 48.26% of points on his second serve, while Patael has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Harris, in recent form, has won 49.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Patael has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.85% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Harris has saved 63.59% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Patael has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Harris has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 56/ 35), with Patael winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Harris has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 150/ 84), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 45/ 32). Patael has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 212/ 133), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Harris has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.42% of matches (W/L 41/ 28), where as Patael has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 2/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Harris winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Harris winning 3 and Patael winning 3. The last match between Harris and Patael was at the M15 Sozopol, 17-10-2021, Semifinals, Hard with Billy Harris getting the victory 4-6 6-1 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:46:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Harris and Patael have played a deciding set 2 times, with Harris winning 1 times and Patael 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Harris winning 1, and Patael 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Harris has played against opponents with an average rank of 228.45 while Patael has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Harris has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Patael has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Harris has converted 39.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Patael has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
201
Rank
181
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
809
Rank
379
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
62% (364-224)
Career Total W/L
59% (256-181)
45% (14-17)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$83,655
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Billy Harris | Ben Patael |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 31 | 30 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:46:30 | 2:46:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (123/194) | 64% (135/210) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (88/123) | 65% (88/135) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (35/71) | 49% (37/75) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 32% (6/19) | 40% (6/15) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (85/210) | 37% (71/194) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Billy Harris
Player
Ben Patael
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| 5-7 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
73 of
127)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
4
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
44%
(
24 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
42%
(
53 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
112
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Billy Harris | Ben Patael |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (14/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (34/40) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (360/367) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 135 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:56 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 246.42 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1492/2356) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1039/1492) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (417/864) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (78/199) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (855/2340) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 42% (11/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (12/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (6/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 58% (19/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 42% (19/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Billy Harris Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Billy Harris
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Manuel Guinard
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
110)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Billy Harris
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Billy Harris
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Billy Harris
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Jozef Kovalik
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Adrian Andreev
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
106)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Billy Harris
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Billy Harris
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ben Patael Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amit Vales
Player
Ben Patael
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Ben Patael
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Joshua Luck
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tuncay Duran
Player
Ben Patael
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Jonathan Baron
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Ben Patael
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Denisov
Player
Ben Patael
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yunseok Jang
Player
Ben Patael
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Shivank Bhatnagar
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Ben Patael
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Harris Vs Patael Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
